Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law,” “Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word”

sltrib Friday, July 10, 2020 8:31:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote ( about Bernadine Natalie Moni Elimbi ) : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because [the US] Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

taipeitimes Friday, July 10, 2020 7:54:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “We do not pretend to foretell the future and we proceed well aware of the potential for cost and conflict around jurisdictional boundaries, especially ones that have gone unappreciated for so long,” “But it is unclear why pessimism should rule the day. With the passage of time, Oklahoma and its Tribes have proven they can work successfully together as partners”

sentinelsource Friday, July 10, 2020 7:33:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. "

news-yahoo Friday, July 10, 2020 5:47:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever. ... Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

click2houston Friday, July 10, 2020 5:41:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. "

ibtimes-sg Friday, July 10, 2020 5:31:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise,”

guardian Friday, July 10, 2020 3:03:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever. ... Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,"

arkansasonline Friday, July 10, 2020 12:28:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law," "Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word"

israelnationalnews Friday, July 10, 2020 10:10:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. "

news-yahoo Friday, July 10, 2020 7:27:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. "

yahoo-au Friday, July 10, 2020 5:23:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. "Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word"

bbc Friday, July 10, 2020 5:16:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

kgw Friday, July 10, 2020 4:42:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

eurasiareview Friday, July 10, 2020 3:33:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today, we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law,”

voanews Friday, July 10, 2020 2:59:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "We do not pretend to foretell the future, and we proceed well aware of the potential for cost and conflict around jurisdictional boundaries, especially ones that have gone unappreciated for so long," "But it is unclear why pessimism should rule the day. With the passage of time, Oklahoma and its Tribes have proven they can work successfully together as partners"

usaToday Friday, July 10, 2020 1:50:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "The federal government promised the (Muscogee Creek Nation) a reservation in perpetuity,"

usaToday Friday, July 10, 2020 1:50:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,"

news-yahoo Friday, July 10, 2020 12:47:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever. ... Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

startribune Thursday, July 9, 2020 11:28:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever. ... Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,"

abc7ny Thursday, July 9, 2020 10:59:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever. ... Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,"

startribune Thursday, July 9, 2020 10:55:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law,” “Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word”

newrepublic Thursday, July 9, 2020 10:26:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

siouxcityjournal Thursday, July 9, 2020 10:17:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "But it is unclear why pessimism should rule the day. With the passage of time, Oklahoma and its Tribes have proven they can work successfully as partners,"

msn-uk Thursday, July 9, 2020 9:37:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Over time, Congress has diminished that reservation. It has sometimes restricted and other times expanded the Tribe's authority. But Congress has never withdrawn the promised reservation," "If Congress wishes to withdraw its promises, it must say so. Unlawful acts, performed long enough and with sufficient vigour, are never enough to amend the law"

msn-uk Thursday, July 9, 2020 9:37:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever. ... Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

startribune Thursday, July 9, 2020 9:16:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

dailynews Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:56:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

whittierdailynews Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:44:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "We do not pretend to foretell the future, and we proceed well aware of the potential for cost and conflict around jurisdictional boundaries, especially ones that have gone unappreciated for so long," "But it is unclear why pessimism should rule the day. With the passage of time, Oklahoma and its Tribes have proven they can work successfully together as partners"

news-yahoo Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:39:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "The federal government promised the (Muscogee Creek Nation) a reservation in perpetuity,"

news-yahoo Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:39:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law,” “Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word”

news-yahoo Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:39:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

wishtv Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:34:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch said ( about Bernadine Natalie Moni Elimbi ) : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law,” “Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word”

ibtimes Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:18:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch said : “The federal government promised the Creek a reservation in perpetuity. Over time, Congress has diminished that reservation. It has sometimes restricted and other times expanded the tribe’s authority. But Congress has never withdrawn the promised reservation. As a result, many of the arguments before us today follow a sadly familiar pattern,” “Yes, promises were made, but the price of keeping them has become too great, so now we should just cast a blind eye. We reject that thinking. If Congress wishes to withdraw its promises, it must say so. Unlawful acts, performed long enough and with sufficient vigor, are never enough to amend the law. To hold otherwise would be to elevate the most brazen and longstanding injustices over the law, both rewarding wrong and failing those in the right”

ibtimes Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:18:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

TorontoStar Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:12:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,"

startribune Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:08:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch said : "I guess I'm struggling to think why that should be relevant in an interpretation of statutes from the last century,"

aljazeera-en Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:58:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

HonululuAdvertiser Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:33:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

orlandosentinel Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:04:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

startribune Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:01:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "In reaching our conclusion about what the law demands of us today, we do not pretend to foretell the future and we proceed well aware of the potential for cost and conflict around jurisdictional boundaries, especially ones that have gone unappreciated for so long,"

telegram Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:57:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

dailyjournal Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:55:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

wftv Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:51:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "In reaching our conclusion about what the law demands of us today, we do not pretend to foretell the future and we proceed well aware of the potential for cost and conflict around jurisdictional boundaries, especially ones that have gone unappreciated for so long,"

ohio Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:43:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

missoulian Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:37:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,"

voanews-sw Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:27:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

oregonlive Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:26:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

nbcdfw Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:22:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

eagletribune Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:18:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

siouxcityjournal Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:14:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

12newsnow Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:12:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

wtsp Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:06:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch said : "the contraceptive mandate imposes a substantial burden on any employer who, like the Little Sisters, has a sincere religious objection to the use of a listed contraceptive and a sincere religious belief that compliance with the mandate (through the accommodation or otherwise) makes it complicit in the provision to the employer's workers of a contraceptive to which the employer has a religious objection"

christiantoday Thursday, July 9, 2020 3:25:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Severing and voiding the government-debt exception does nothing to address the injury they claim; after today’s ruling, federal law bars the plaintiffs from using robocalls to promote political causes just as stoutly as it did before,”

news-yahoo Tuesday, July 7, 2020 12:23:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Somehow, in the name of vindicating the First Amendment, our remedial course today leads to the unlikely result that not a single person will be allowed to speak more freely and, instead, more speech will be banned,"

upi Monday, July 6, 2020 11:04:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today, we must decide whether an employer can fire someone simply for being homosexual or transgender,”

news-yahoo Sunday, July 5, 2020 1:40:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex"

nbcnews Friday, July 3, 2020 2:21:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “It is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating … based on sex,”

tribtown Wednesday, July 1, 2020 10:57:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “It has become increasingly apparent that this Court must, at some point, confront these important objections to this increasingly widespread practice,”

theepochtimes Tuesday, June 30, 2020 3:15:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Because discrimination on the basis of homosexuality or transgender status requires an employer to intentionally treat individual employees differently because of their sex,”

forbes Saturday, June 27, 2020 2:38:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “In Title VII, Congress adopted broad language making it illegal for an employer to rely on an employee’s sex when deciding to fire that employee,”

foreignaffairs-nz Friday, June 26, 2020 9:01:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Because RFRA operates as a kind of super statute, displacing the normal operation of other federal laws, it might supersede Title VII’s commands in appropriate cases,” “But how these doctrines protecting religious liberty interact with Title VII are questions for future cases”

nbcnews Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:11:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "If the employer fires the male employee for no reason other than the fact he is attracted to men, the employer discriminates against him for traits or actions it tolerates in his female colleague,"

mondaq Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:11:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Congress adopted broad language making it illegal for an employer to rely on an employee’s sex when deciding to fire that employee. We do not hesitate to recognize today a necessary consequence of that legislative choice: An employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender defies the law” “We should never give in. We should fight for every square inch of freedom,”

gazette Saturday, June 20, 2020 1:56:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,”

orlandosentinel Saturday, June 20, 2020 1:13:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,”

newschannel6now Saturday, June 20, 2020 12:41:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,"

siouxcityjournal Saturday, June 20, 2020 12:09:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,"

news-yahoo Friday, June 19, 2020 11:30:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,"

clickondetroit Friday, June 19, 2020 11:12:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,"

msn-uk Friday, June 19, 2020 11:10:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,”

therepublic Friday, June 19, 2020 11:02:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,”

dailyjournal Friday, June 19, 2020 10:58:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,"

news4jax Friday, June 19, 2020 10:55:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,”

tribtown Friday, June 19, 2020 10:20:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “It is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex,”

whittierdailynews Friday, June 19, 2020 10:07:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “That statute prohibits the federal government from substantially burdening a person’s exercise of religion unless it demonstrates that doing so both furthers a compelling governmental interest and represents the least restrictive means of furthering that interest,” “Because RFRA operates as a kind of super statute, displacing the normal operation of other federal laws, it might supersede Title VII’s commands in appropriate cases”

news-yahoo Thursday, June 18, 2020 11:33:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch déclaré : "Je veux dire ma reconnaissance à ma famille, à mes amis et à ma foi"

ipreunion Wednesday, February 1, 2017 5:32:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch déclaré : "Je veux dire ma reconnaissance à ma famille, à mes amis et à ma foi"

rtl-BE Wednesday, February 1, 2017 9:47:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch déclaré : "Je veux dire ma reconnaissance à ma famille, à mes amis et à ma foi"

leparisien Wednesday, February 1, 2017 9:42:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch disse : "O que se espera de nós? Imparcialidade e independência, companheirismo e valor"

destak Wednesday, February 1, 2017 6:01:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law,” “Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word”

sltrib Friday, July 10, 2020 8:31:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote ( about Bernadine Natalie Moni Elimbi ) : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because [the US] Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

taipeitimes Friday, July 10, 2020 7:54:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “We do not pretend to foretell the future and we proceed well aware of the potential for cost and conflict around jurisdictional boundaries, especially ones that have gone unappreciated for so long,” “But it is unclear why pessimism should rule the day. With the passage of time, Oklahoma and its Tribes have proven they can work successfully together as partners”

sentinelsource Friday, July 10, 2020 7:33:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. "

news-yahoo Friday, July 10, 2020 5:47:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever. ... Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

click2houston Friday, July 10, 2020 5:41:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. "

ibtimes-sg Friday, July 10, 2020 5:31:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise,”

guardian Friday, July 10, 2020 3:03:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever. ... Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,"

arkansasonline Friday, July 10, 2020 12:28:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law," "Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word"

israelnationalnews Friday, July 10, 2020 10:10:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. "

news-yahoo Friday, July 10, 2020 7:27:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. "

yahoo-au Friday, July 10, 2020 5:23:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. "Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word"

bbc Friday, July 10, 2020 5:16:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

kgw Friday, July 10, 2020 4:42:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

eurasiareview Friday, July 10, 2020 3:33:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today, we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law,”

voanews Friday, July 10, 2020 2:59:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "We do not pretend to foretell the future, and we proceed well aware of the potential for cost and conflict around jurisdictional boundaries, especially ones that have gone unappreciated for so long," "But it is unclear why pessimism should rule the day. With the passage of time, Oklahoma and its Tribes have proven they can work successfully together as partners"

usaToday Friday, July 10, 2020 1:50:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "The federal government promised the (Muscogee Creek Nation) a reservation in perpetuity,"

usaToday Friday, July 10, 2020 1:50:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,"

news-yahoo Friday, July 10, 2020 12:47:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever. ... Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

startribune Thursday, July 9, 2020 11:28:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever. ... Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,"

abc7ny Thursday, July 9, 2020 10:59:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever. ... Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,"

startribune Thursday, July 9, 2020 10:55:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law,” “Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word”

newrepublic Thursday, July 9, 2020 10:26:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

siouxcityjournal Thursday, July 9, 2020 10:17:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "But it is unclear why pessimism should rule the day. With the passage of time, Oklahoma and its Tribes have proven they can work successfully as partners,"

msn-uk Thursday, July 9, 2020 9:37:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Over time, Congress has diminished that reservation. It has sometimes restricted and other times expanded the Tribe's authority. But Congress has never withdrawn the promised reservation," "If Congress wishes to withdraw its promises, it must say so. Unlawful acts, performed long enough and with sufficient vigour, are never enough to amend the law"

msn-uk Thursday, July 9, 2020 9:37:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands in the West would be secure forever. ... Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

startribune Thursday, July 9, 2020 9:16:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

dailynews Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:56:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

whittierdailynews Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:44:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "We do not pretend to foretell the future, and we proceed well aware of the potential for cost and conflict around jurisdictional boundaries, especially ones that have gone unappreciated for so long," "But it is unclear why pessimism should rule the day. With the passage of time, Oklahoma and its Tribes have proven they can work successfully together as partners"

news-yahoo Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:39:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "The federal government promised the (Muscogee Creek Nation) a reservation in perpetuity,"

news-yahoo Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:39:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law,” “Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word”

news-yahoo Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:39:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

wishtv Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:34:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch said ( about Bernadine Natalie Moni Elimbi ) : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law,” “Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word”

ibtimes Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:18:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch said : “The federal government promised the Creek a reservation in perpetuity. Over time, Congress has diminished that reservation. It has sometimes restricted and other times expanded the tribe’s authority. But Congress has never withdrawn the promised reservation. As a result, many of the arguments before us today follow a sadly familiar pattern,” “Yes, promises were made, but the price of keeping them has become too great, so now we should just cast a blind eye. We reject that thinking. If Congress wishes to withdraw its promises, it must say so. Unlawful acts, performed long enough and with sufficient vigor, are never enough to amend the law. To hold otherwise would be to elevate the most brazen and longstanding injustices over the law, both rewarding wrong and failing those in the right”

ibtimes Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:18:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

TorontoStar Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:12:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,"

startribune Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:08:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch said : "I guess I'm struggling to think why that should be relevant in an interpretation of statutes from the last century,"

aljazeera-en Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:58:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

HonululuAdvertiser Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:33:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

orlandosentinel Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:04:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

startribune Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:01:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "In reaching our conclusion about what the law demands of us today, we do not pretend to foretell the future and we proceed well aware of the potential for cost and conflict around jurisdictional boundaries, especially ones that have gone unappreciated for so long,"

telegram Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:57:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

dailyjournal Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:55:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

wftv Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:51:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "In reaching our conclusion about what the law demands of us today, we do not pretend to foretell the future and we proceed well aware of the potential for cost and conflict around jurisdictional boundaries, especially ones that have gone unappreciated for so long,"

ohio Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:43:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

missoulian Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:37:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,"

voanews-sw Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:27:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

oregonlive Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:26:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

nbcdfw Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:22:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

eagletribune Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:18:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

siouxcityjournal Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:14:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

12newsnow Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:12:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,”

wtsp Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:06:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch said : "the contraceptive mandate imposes a substantial burden on any employer who, like the Little Sisters, has a sincere religious objection to the use of a listed contraceptive and a sincere religious belief that compliance with the mandate (through the accommodation or otherwise) makes it complicit in the provision to the employer's workers of a contraceptive to which the employer has a religious objection"

christiantoday Thursday, July 9, 2020 3:25:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Severing and voiding the government-debt exception does nothing to address the injury they claim; after today’s ruling, federal law bars the plaintiffs from using robocalls to promote political causes just as stoutly as it did before,”

news-yahoo Tuesday, July 7, 2020 12:23:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "Somehow, in the name of vindicating the First Amendment, our remedial course today leads to the unlikely result that not a single person will be allowed to speak more freely and, instead, more speech will be banned,"

upi Monday, July 6, 2020 11:04:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Today, we must decide whether an employer can fire someone simply for being homosexual or transgender,”

news-yahoo Sunday, July 5, 2020 1:40:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex"

nbcnews Friday, July 3, 2020 2:21:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “It is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating … based on sex,”

tribtown Wednesday, July 1, 2020 10:57:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “It has become increasingly apparent that this Court must, at some point, confront these important objections to this increasingly widespread practice,”

theepochtimes Tuesday, June 30, 2020 3:15:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Because discrimination on the basis of homosexuality or transgender status requires an employer to intentionally treat individual employees differently because of their sex,”

forbes Saturday, June 27, 2020 2:38:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “In Title VII, Congress adopted broad language making it illegal for an employer to rely on an employee’s sex when deciding to fire that employee,”

foreignaffairs-nz Friday, June 26, 2020 9:01:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Because RFRA operates as a kind of super statute, displacing the normal operation of other federal laws, it might supersede Title VII’s commands in appropriate cases,” “But how these doctrines protecting religious liberty interact with Title VII are questions for future cases”

nbcnews Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:11:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "If the employer fires the male employee for no reason other than the fact he is attracted to men, the employer discriminates against him for traits or actions it tolerates in his female colleague,"

mondaq Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:11:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Congress adopted broad language making it illegal for an employer to rely on an employee’s sex when deciding to fire that employee. We do not hesitate to recognize today a necessary consequence of that legislative choice: An employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender defies the law” “We should never give in. We should fight for every square inch of freedom,”

gazette Saturday, June 20, 2020 1:56:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,”

orlandosentinel Saturday, June 20, 2020 1:13:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,”

newschannel6now Saturday, June 20, 2020 12:41:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,"

siouxcityjournal Saturday, June 20, 2020 12:09:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,"

news-yahoo Friday, June 19, 2020 11:30:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,"

clickondetroit Friday, June 19, 2020 11:12:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,"

msn-uk Friday, June 19, 2020 11:10:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,”

therepublic Friday, June 19, 2020 11:02:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,”

dailyjournal Friday, June 19, 2020 10:58:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : "An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,"

news4jax Friday, June 19, 2020 10:55:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what (civil rights law) forbids,”

tribtown Friday, June 19, 2020 10:20:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “It is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex,”

whittierdailynews Friday, June 19, 2020 10:07:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch wrote : “That statute prohibits the federal government from substantially burdening a person’s exercise of religion unless it demonstrates that doing so both furthers a compelling governmental interest and represents the least restrictive means of furthering that interest,” “Because RFRA operates as a kind of super statute, displacing the normal operation of other federal laws, it might supersede Title VII’s commands in appropriate cases”

news-yahoo Thursday, June 18, 2020 11:33:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch déclaré : "Je veux dire ma reconnaissance à ma famille, à mes amis et à ma foi"

ipreunion Wednesday, February 1, 2017 5:32:00 PM EAT

Neil Gorsuch déclaré : "Je veux dire ma reconnaissance à ma famille, à mes amis et à ma foi"

rtl-BE Wednesday, February 1, 2017 9:47:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch déclaré : "Je veux dire ma reconnaissance à ma famille, à mes amis et à ma foi"

leparisien Wednesday, February 1, 2017 9:42:00 AM EAT

Neil Gorsuch disse : "O que se espera de nós? Imparcialidade e independência, companheirismo e valor"

destak Wednesday, February 1, 2017 6:01:00 AM EAT